Legal Opinion

Cook Railway Signal Co. v. Buck

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 3, 1915No. 7936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Denver District Court. Hon. Greeley W. Whit-ford, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

The action was in mandamus by Euphemia N. Buck, defendant in error, against the Cook Railway Signal Company and others, plaintiffs in error, to compel the transfer on the books of the company, and the issuance to her, of certain of its capital stock, which she claimed to have bought of her husband, and which he had assigned to her. An alternative writ issued which was made peremptory, and the company brings the case here for review. •

By answer the defendant put in issue practically every averment of the petition and writ, the averments relating to a demand for the issuance of the stock and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. . MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Brinkerhoff-Farris Trust & Savings Co. v. Home Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Parr v. SexsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  4. Senn v. Union Premium & Mercantile Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Board of Directors of the Yellow Jacket Irrigation District v. WesselsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tracey v. FranklinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1949
  2. Sterling Loan & Investment Co. v. LitelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  3. Age Publishing Co. v. BeckerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  4. Mancini v. PatriziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API