Mancini v. Patrizi
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DO CLING, J., pro tem.
This case grows out of a dispute that has already been much litigated and the basic facts have been twice previously before the appellate courts. (Mancini v. Setaro, 69 Cal. App. 748 [232 Pac. 495] ; Mancini v. Patrizi, 87 Cal. App. 435 [262 Pac. 375].) As in the two former cases, plaintiff and respondent has obtained judgment for the statutory penalty of four hundred dollars for the refusal of defendant and appellant to transfer on the books of L ’Italia Press Co., a corporation of which appellant is the president, eight shares of its capital stock represented by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barrett v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Baumohl v. GoldsteinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
- Casper v. Kalt-Zimmers Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Farmers' Mercantile & Supply Co. v. LaunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Sterling Loan & Investment Co. v. LitelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tu-Vu Drive-In Corp. v. AshkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Vannucci v. PedriniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Oakland Scavenger Co. v. GandiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Zellerbach Paper Co. v. Virden Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935