Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bunn v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 20, 1942No. 29330Published

1DissentMacIntyre, J.

There is an ordinance of the City of Atlanta which reads as follows: “Be it ordained by the Mayor and General Council of the City of Atlanta, that from and after the passage of this ordinance it shall be the duty of all owners and/or operators of taxicabs or autos for hire within the City of Atlanta to indicate on the side of vehicle whether the taxicab or auto for hire shall be used by and shall serve white or negro passengers. The sign shall be painted on under the owner’s and operator’s sign, and shall be in letters not less than one inch in height. The sign shall read ‘For White…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. WarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Hodge Drive-It-Yourself Co. v. CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Chaires v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  4. Carey v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  5. Glover v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API