Legal Opinion

Lyons v. Adel

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1917No. File No. 4172PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal- from, Circuit Court, Tripp County. Hon. Frank B. Smith, Judge. Replevin by I. M. Lyons, against Adam Adel, for a crop of wheat. From, a judgment for defendant, and from an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals. (1) To point one of the opinion, Appellant cited: Kettering et al. v. Barber et al. (S. D.) 159 N. W. 133; “Judicial Sales” in 24 -Cyc.; 27 Cyc. 1491, 1729, 1730; Code -Civ.

Read the full summary

Appeal- from, Circuit Court, Tripp County. Hon. Frank B. Smith, Judge. Replevin by I. M. Lyons, against Adam Adel, for a crop of wheat. From, a judgment for defendant, and from an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals. (1) To point one of the opinion, Appellant cited: Kettering et al. v. Barber et al. (S. D.) 159 N. W. 133; “Judicial Sales” in 24 -Cyc.; 27 Cyc. 1491, 1729, 1730; Code -Civ. Pro., Sees. 653, 662; 12 Cyc. 977; Downard v. Graff, 40 Iowa, 597; Wooton v. White (Md.) 44 A. to26; Shilton v. Harrow, 47 Pac. 177. Respondent cited: Code Civ. P’roc., Secs. 653, 656, 662, 383;…

1Opinion of the CourtMcCO-Y, J.

This action in replevin to recover the possession of a crop of winter wheat of about 1,000 bushels resulted in findings and judgment in favor of defendant, from which plaintiff appeals..

[1] There is no substantial conflict in the evidence, the only matter of controversy being the application of law to the facts. In 1911 respondent, as mortgagor, gave a mortgage upon the real estate upon which said crop was grown, and upon- condition being broken, a foreclosure sale of said real estate was made on the 6th day of June, 1914, the Sioux City Brewing Company, the mortgagee, becoming the purchaser…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Page v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Stockwell v. . PhelpsNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  3. Churchill v. AckermanWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Johnston v. FishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Lindsay v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Power Mercantile Co. v. Moore Mercantile Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Zeigler v. BlechaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API