Legal Opinion

Zeigler v. Blecha

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCheistiaNSON, J.

The plaintiff, as alleged owner of certain wheat, seeks to recover damages for the conversion thereof. The case was tried to a jury; bnt at the conclusion of all the evidence both parties moved for a directed verdict. The jury was thereupon discharged and the trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and ordered judgment to be entered, in favor of the defendant. Judgment was entered accordingly and the plaintiff appeals.

The appeal presents only questions of law. The material and undisputed facts are substantially as follows: On February 16, 1920, Jen-sine Wendahl and her…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Page v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Stockwell v. . PhelpsNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  3. Churchill v. AckermanWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Roney v. H. S. Halvorsen Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Aultman & Taylor Co. v. O'DowdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. BrakkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. BrakkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. HerzigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. In Re GlinzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1987
  5. State v. HerzigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API