Legal Opinion
Dunn & Black, P.S. v. United States
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided February 25, 2005No. CV-04-0229-LRSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SUKO, District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is Intervenors’ Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and American Guaranty & Liability Insurance Company’s [Intervenors 1 ] Motion for Declaratory Judgment, filed October 19, 2004 (Ct.Ree.20); Plaintiff Dunn and Black, P.S.’s [law firm] Motion for Summary Judgment (Ct.Ree.28), filed November 2, 2004; and Intervenors’ Alternative Motion For Stay of Plaintiffs Motion For Summary Judgment under Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(f) (Ct.Rec.40), filed November 16, 2004. These motions were heard with oral argument on December 20, 2004, at which time the court requested…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dunn & Black, P.S. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Dunn & Black Ps v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007