Legal Opinion

Sproul v. Stein

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1943No. Appeal, 182PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

This is an action of assumpsit upon a fidelity bond executed by the Eagle Indemnity Company, a paid surety, in favor of Pry & Mathias, Inc. and Provident Trust Company of Pittsburgh, “jointly but not severally”, to insure them against loss by larceny or embezzlement of “money, funds or other personal property”, on the part of the principal, Harry A. Stein. The bond is in the amount of $25,000. The trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiffs in the same amount. Defendant’s motions for judgment n. o. v. and a new trial were refused, whereupon this appeal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Taney v. Penn National Bank of ReadingSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Chester-Cambridge Bank & Trust Co. v. RhodesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Taney v. Penn Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
  4. Miller v. BrowarskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  5. In re Miller Pure Rye Distilling Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. TrimbleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API