Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Trimble

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1962No. Appeal, 18PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

In this appeal from an order on appellant for the support of his family he assigns nine questions of alleged error, but only two of them were raised in the proceeding below, viz., (a) the right of his spouse to testify and (b) the sufficiency of the evidence. For the reason that they were not raised in the court below, the other seven assignments will not be considered. Sproul v. Stein, 348 Pa. 269, 35 A. 2d 61; Parke v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers Mutual Casualty Ins. Co., 334 Pa. 417, 6 A. 2d 304; Blose v. Martens, 173 Pa. Superior Ct. 122, 95 A. 2d 340.

As to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blose v. MartensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Parke v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers Mutual Casualty Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Commonwealth v. TrimbleBucks County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1961
  4. Sproul v. SteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sutliff v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Weiser v. WeiserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Cann v. CannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Newcomer v. NewcomerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Sutliff v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API