Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Folmar & Associates, LLP

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 10, 2003No. 1011572PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

S. Felton Mitchell, Jr., appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict against him and in favor of Folmar Associates, LLP ("Folmar"), the plaintiff in this malicious-prosecution action. The judgment awarded $51,918.40 in compensatory damages, which was the exact amount of the attorney fees and costs Folmar expended in defending against Mitchell's first counterclaim (the gravamen of Folmar's malicious-prosecution action), and $103,836.80 in punitive damages, which is two times the amount of the compensatory damages.

Folmar is a partnership primarily engaged in developing and managing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Eidson v. Olin Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Cutts v. American United Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Alabama Power Co. v. NeighborsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Superskate, Inc. v. Nolen by MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. Boothby Realty Co. v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Borders v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. B.M. v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Connecticut v. Miller, 1100619 (Ala. 12-2-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  4. Beiersdoerfer v. HILB, ROGAL AND HAMILTONSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  5. Moon v. PillionSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API