Legal Opinion
B.M. v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided July 9, 2004No. 2030077 and 2030078PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRAWLEY, Judge.
B.M. (“the mother”) and M.F. (“the father”) are the unmarried parents of three children, B.R.M. (d/o/b — 01/14/98) (“the oldest child”), I.S.S.M. (d/o/b — 12/27/01) (“the middle child”), and I.C.J.M. (d/o/b— 09/05/03) (“the infant”). In July 1999, the oldest child was removed from her mother’s custody after the Department of Human Resources (“DHR”) was notified by Children’s Hospital that the mother was suspected of perpetrating Munchausen’s syndrome by proxy (“MBP”) abuse upon the oldest child. When the middle child and the infant were born, each was removed from the mother’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Bowman v. STATE DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCESCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Costarides v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Superskate, Inc. v. Nolen by MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- R.B. v. State Dept. of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- A.E.T. v. Limestone County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- H.T. v. Cleburne County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
- A.R. v. State Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
- K.P. v. Etowah County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- T.G. v. Houston County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.