Legal Opinion

Klineburger v. Maritrans

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1991No. 1389PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The issue in this appeal is whether a ship’s captain can recover under general principles of admiralty law or under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.App. § 688, for physical or emotional manifestations of work related stress. The trial court held that there could be no such recovery and entered summary judgment in favor of the defendant ship owner. After careful review, we affirm.

In July, 1986, Joseph R. Klineburger, an employee of Maritrans with sixteen years experience, was serving as captain of Tanker Barge 71, which had been engaged to transport a cargo of molten asphalt from…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Miles v. Apex Marine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nelsen v. Research Corp. of the University of HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1992
  2. Redinger v. Clapper's Tree Service Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Foster v. Maritrans, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Canty v. Sun Transport, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Bunting v. Sun Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API