Legal Opinion

Canty v. Sun Transport, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 1992No. 1371PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge.

The issue in this maritime case is whether appellant made out a prima facie case that appellee-shipowner was negligent under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.App. § 688, or that appellee’s vessel was unseaworthy under general maritime common law. The trial court granted appellee’s motion for a nonsuit. We affirm.

Plaintiff-appellant Dennis Canty sued appellee for personal injuries he suffered while employed aboard appellee’s vessel. At trial, the only liability evidence presented by appellant was his own testimony. He was employed as an automotive oiler on board appellee’s ship New York…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zito v. Merit Outlet StoresSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Foster v. Maritrans, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Bruce v. Fieles, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1996
  4. Luteran v. Fairchild Weston Systems Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1996
  5. Struble v. Valley Forge Military Academy, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API