Foster v. Maritrans, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
STEVENS, J.:
¶ 1 Maritrans Operating Partners, L.P. (Maritrans) appeals from a December 11, 2000 judgment in favor of Robert and Ann Foster.
¶ 2 The record before us reveals that Robert Foster was employed as a merchant seaman on February 29, 1996, when he slipped and fell on the icy deck of a tugboat owned and operated by Mari-trans. On February 6, 1998, Foster and his wife filed a civil action against Mari-trans, alleging that Maritrans was negligent under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.App. § 688 et seq.,1 and that the tugboat was unseaworthy under general maritime law.
¶ 3 On May 2, 2000, a jury…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Broxie v. Household Finance CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Rohm & Haas Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Corvin, J. v. Tihansky, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- BARTOE v. Missouri Barge Line Co. Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2009
- Bodon-Soto v. Cohen, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County2010
- Foster Et Ux. v. Maritrans, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Moore, R. v. Mulligan MiningSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.