Legal Opinion

Foster v. Maritrans, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 9, 2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, J.:

¶ 1 Maritrans Operating Partners, L.P. (Maritrans) appeals from a December 11, 2000 judgment in favor of Robert and Ann Foster.

¶ 2 The record before us reveals that Robert Foster was employed as a merchant seaman on February 29, 1996, when he slipped and fell on the icy deck of a tugboat owned and operated by Mari-trans. On February 6, 1998, Foster and his wife filed a civil action against Mari-trans, alleging that Maritrans was negligent under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.App. § 688 et seq.,1 and that the tugboat was unseaworthy under general maritime law.

¶ 3 On May 2, 2000, a jury…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Broxie v. Household Finance CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Rohm & Haas Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Corvin, J. v. Tihansky, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. BARTOE v. Missouri Barge Line Co. Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2009
  3. Bodon-Soto v. Cohen, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County2010
  4. Foster Et Ux. v. Maritrans, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Moore, R. v. Mulligan MiningSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API