Ritter v. M.A. Mortenson Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order granting the respondent’s motion for summary judgment. The trial court determined as a matter of law that the appellant was barred from bringing this action by Minn.Stat. § 176.061 (Supp.1983) — the election of remedies provision of the Minnesota workers’ compensation statute. We affirm.
FACTS
The appellant, Charles Ritter, was injured in February, 1980, while working for H.D. Engineering Design and Erection Company (“H.D.”) as a steelworker. H.D. was at that time a subcontractor hired to do the steel work on a garage being built for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McCourtie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Gleason v. GearySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Rademaker v. Archer Daniels Midland Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Iverson v. Independent School District No. 547Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Greaton v. EnichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
3Cited by7 opinions
- O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Teska v. Potlatch Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2002
- Brandt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Sorenson v. VisserCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Larson v. Anderson, Taunton & Walsh, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.