Greaton v. Enich
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
Appeal from summary judgment in an action by a secured creditor to recover the balance of the purchase price due under a conditional sales contract. The issue is whether, on the showing made in support of such motion, the trial court was warranted in holding that, under authority of Yellow Mfg. Acceptance Corp. v. Handler, 249 Minn. 539, 83 N. W. (2d) 103, plaintiff elected to repossess the property, thereby defeating her right to recovery of the balance of the purchase price.
On the basis of the record, pleadings, affidavits, depositions, and interrogatories, it appears that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. St. Paul Mercury-Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Ahlm v. RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. HandlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Minnesota State Bank of St. Paul v. BatcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ridgewood Development Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Jacobson v. Rauenhorst CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Ritter v. M.A. Mortenson Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Ridgewood Development Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980