Huffman v. San Joaquin Cty.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Fifth Judicial District. The facts appear in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.
J. and Norton, J. concurring.
The plaintiff in this action seeks to recover damages against the county of San Joaquin, for injuries alleged to have been sustained by him in consequence of the want of proper repairs to a bridge on a public highway of the county. The complaint alleges, substantially, that it was the duty of the county to keep the bridge in question in proper repair and condition; that the bridge was out of repair and “ dangerous for travel that the county neglected to repair it, and that the plaintiff had sustained special damage thereby ; and that his claim for damages had been…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Doeg v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Town of Ukiah City v. Ukiah Water & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Dillwood v. RiecksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Winbigler v. Mayor of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Granger v. Pulaski CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1870
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.