Legal Opinion

Town of Ukiah City v. Ukiah Water & Improvement Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1904No. S.F. No. 2830PublishedCited by 34 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This action was instituted by the town of Ukiah City to recover damages against the defendant water company for the destruction of plaintiff’s property by fire, the liability of defendant being predicated upon its negligence, and upon the breach of its contract with the plaintiff for supplying water in its supply-pipes and fire-hydrants under sufficient pressure for effective use. A general demurrer was interposed to the complaint and overruled. The defendant answered, and trial was had resulting in a verdict of the jury, under the instructions of the court, in favor of the plaintiff. The…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Gorrell v. Greensboro Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance v. Village of KeesevilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Brinkmeyer v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Howsmon v. Trenton Water Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Paducah Lumber Co. v. Paducah Water Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Davoust v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Allen & Currey Mfg. Co. v. Shreveport Waterworks Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  3. City & County of San Francisco v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Hunt Bros. Co. v. San Lorenzo Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Stuart v. Crestview Mutual Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API