State v. Wendell
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
TITUS, Judge.
Defendant was found guilty of two counts of first degree robbery. He was represented at trial by counsel of his own selection and is represented on this appeal 'by different counsel of his choice.
Under points relied on, defendant asserts the trial court erred in permitting the state to show, via cross-examination of him and through the direct testimony of other witnesses, that he had been investigated for, arrested and charged with various crimes which had not resulted in convictions. Defendant likewise contends it was error to permit the state to cross-examine two of his…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. MeiersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- State v. CaffeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- State v. HurttSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- State v. ScownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- State v. GranberryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. CannadyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. WilliamsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. HarperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. HaslipMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. BurnsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.