State v. Harper

TITUS, Judge.

Tried under the habitual criminal law, defendant was jury-convicted of second degree burglary and stealing and court-sentenced to consecutive terms of imprisonment of six and four years.

The points relied on, while composed with some indifference to the requirements of Rule 84.04(d), V.A.M.R., will, nevertheless, be considered upon merits where deserving.

I

During voir dire examination of the jury panel, the prosecutor asked the array a question to which defendant objected. The court promptly sustained the objection and properly explained the reason therefor. Defendant did not ask…