Rohmer v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. Section 211(a) (1) (A) 1 11expressly includes “interest” and “rents” but not royalties. Yet the following legislative history shows, we think, that Congress intended to include royalties. From 1918 to 1934, inclusive, the Revenue Acts successively contained a provision — substantially like the present § 143(b), 26 U.S. C.A.Int.Rev.Code, — for a withholding tax on all “rent, salaries, wages, premiums, annuities, compensations, remunerations, * * * or other fixed or determinable annual or periodical gains, profits, and income” of a nonresident alien. Royalties were not…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. HutchesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Markham v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Bell Intercontinental Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Kronner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Commissioner v. WodehouseSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Albert J. Taggi & Ann D. Taggi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Baker Et Ux. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.