Legal Opinion
US Trust Co. of New York v. Alpert
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 30, 1998No. 92 Civ. 9393 (KMW), 93 Civ. 3935(KMW)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KIMBA M. WOOD, District Judge.
Plaintiff Trustees (the “Trustees” or “plaintiffs”) of various unit investment trusts (the “Trusts”) bring these two interpleader actions (93 Civ. 9393 and 93 Civ. 3935 will be referred to herein as “U.S. Trust action” and “Investors Fiduciary action,” respectively) to determine which of three defendant classes of investors in the Trust — Current Holders, Former Holders and Continuous Holders— are entitled to monies paid to the Trusts in settlement of securities fraud claims arising from the default of bonds held by the Trusts. I referred this case to…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Shirley Small v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. And Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Floyd Frank v. Sally B. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States Trust Co. v. JennerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Consolidated Edison, Inc. v. Northeast UtilitiesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Lutheran Brotherhood v. ComyneDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2002
- Forcier Ex Rel. Estate of Forcier v. ForcierDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Krys v. AaronDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.