Legal Opinion
Ankerman v. Mancuso
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 16, 2004No. SC 17086PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
In this certified appeal, the defendant, Jack C. Mancuso, appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing the judgment of the trial court that was rendered in his favor. See Ankerman v. Mancuso, 79 Conn. App. 480, 830 A.2d 388 (2003). The defendant claims that the Appellate Court improperly determined that a violation of rule 1.8 (j) of the Rules of Professional Conduct 1 by the plaintiff, William L. Ankerman, does not bar enforcement of a promissory note executed by the defendant for payment of legal fees for services rendered by the plaintiff. See id., 487.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Olson v. Accessory Controls & Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Stamford Hospital v. VegaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- New England Savings Bank v. Bedford Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- John Burk, P.C. v. BurzynskiWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. OuelletteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Monetary Funding Group, Inc. v. PluchinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- In re William D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Disciplinary Counsel v. ElderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Bank of New York v. ConwayConnecticut Superior Court · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.