Legal Opinion

Goethal v. Kent County Supervisors

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1960No. Calendar 48,662, 48,663, 48,664, 48,665PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

This proceeding involves the following facts. On July 22, 1958, four petitions addressed to the defendant hoard were filed with the Kent county clerk, said petitions seeking the annexation to the city of Grand Rapids of certain territory contiguous thereto. Two proposals involved areas in “Walker township and the others lands located respectively in the townships of Grand Rapids and Wyoming. Said petitions were duly submitted to the board of supervisors and were referred to the committee on annexation, incorporation, and consolidation. Investigation by local officials apparently indicated…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Klise v. Town of RiverdaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  2. Village of Kingsford v. CudlipMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Presque Isle Prosecuting Attorney v. Township of RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Bray v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Kalamazoo Township v. Kalamazoo County ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. AskarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Township of Owosso v. City of OwossoMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Bailey v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Oshtemo Township v. City of KalamazooMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Attorney General v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API