Legal Opinion

Bray v. Stewart

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1927No. Docket No. 43PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, C. J.

On June 4, 1926, certain qualified ■electors of the townships of Nankin and Dearborn, in the county of Wayne, petitioned the board of supervisors of that county, praying that the question of incorporating a part of the territory situate in each of said townships, and particularly described therein, into the village of Inkster, be submitted to the electors of the territory to be affected at the next general ■election, or at a special election to be called for that purpose, pursuant to the provisions of Act No. 278, Pub. Acts 1909 (1 Comp. Laws 1915, § 2843 et seq.), .as amended by Act No. 395,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Shumway v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Commerce-Guardian Trust & Savings Bank v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Oakman v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Elliott v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Attorney General ex rel. Hudson v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wyandotte Savings Bank v. State Banking CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Goethal v. Kent County SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Village of Kingsford v. CudlipMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Presque Isle Prosecuting Attorney v. Township of RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Taylor v. Township of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API