State ex rel. Romley v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McGREGOR, Judge.
The issue in this case is whether a defendant charged with aggravated driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor is entitled to a bifurcated trial at which the state must first establish that he drove under the influence of liquor before being permitted to present evidence that his driver’s license was invalid or restricted. We conclude a bifurcated trial is inappropriate.
I
The state charged Dean Henry Begody and Fidel Jimenez Borunda (defendants) *469with aggravated driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquors or drugs (DUI). The state alleged…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. GeschwindArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. FergusonArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Collins v. UdallArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. GinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Collins v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. GalatiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- State v. RebollosaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- State v. RootCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. GalatiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.