Legal Opinion

State v. Rebollosa

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 19, 1993No. 1 CA-CR 91-0599, 1 CA-CR 92-0422-PRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VOSS, Presiding Judge.

In this case we hold that a stipulation concerning an element of an offense that is accepted by all parties must be presented to the jury.

On August 1, 1990, an officer from the Mesa Police Department observed defendant driving erratically and speeding. The officer stopped defendant and asked him to perform several field sobriety tests. Defendant did so but refused to take a blood or breath test. The field sobriety tests revealed signs of intoxication and defendant was arrested. At his trial, defendant stipulated that he was aware that his driver’s license was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. NashArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Woerth v. City of FlagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. State v. SalazarArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. GeschwindArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. VirgoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Romley v. GalatiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. State v. RootCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. State v. GomezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API