Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Romley v. Galati

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 14, 1999No. 1 CA-SA 98-0143PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOYES, Judge

¶ 1 Defendant, real party in interest Russell K. Petersen, was charged with two counts of aggravated driving under the influence (“DUI”), in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) sections 28-697(A)(1) and (2) (1996) (renumbered as 28-1383(A)(1) and (2) (1998)). The aggravating element of Count 1 was that the new DUI was committed when Petersen’s driver’s license was suspended, canceled, revoked or refused, or restricted. The aggravating element of Count 2 was that Petersen had two prior DUI convictions within the previous sixty months.

¶2 Petersen…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. State v. AlexanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Maibauer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
  4. State v. GeschwindArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. NicholsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. BallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  3. State v. Galati Ex Rel. County of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. HambrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API