Legal Opinion

Campbell v. United States

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided June 12, 1980No. CIV-4-79-41PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ALLOWANCE

NEESE, District Judge.

Unlike many state courts, federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. That jurisdiction has been marked-out by the Congress pursuant to the Constitution, Article III. Aldinger v. Howard (1976), 427 U.S. 1, 15, 96 S.Ct. 2413, 2420, 49 L.Ed.2d 276, 286-287[6]. This Court is not permitted to assume the existence of its jurisdiction; for, without a finding that there exists federal jurisdiction over a particular claim of the plaintiff, this Court is without power to proceed. Memphis Am. Fed. of Tchrs., L. 2032 v. Bd. of Ed., C.A. 6th…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Patricia Scott Anderson v. Air West, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Blackmar v. GuerreSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pugh v. Farmers Home AdministrationDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
  2. Painter v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982
  3. Arundar v. Staff Builders Temporary Personnel, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982
  4. Audio Investments v. RobertsonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2002
  5. Audio Investments v. RobertsonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API