Legal Opinion
In re the Extradition of Liuksila
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 6, 2016No. Magistrate No. 13-970 (DAR)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DEBORAH A. ROBINSON, United States Magistrate Judge
This matter is before the court on the United States’ request on behalf of the government of Finland, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3184, to certify the extraditability of Defendant Aarno Liuksila. Criminal Complaint (Document No. 1). The court filed a Memorandum Opinion on November 7, 2014 denying Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Criminal Complaint and Deny Finland’s Extradition Request (Document No. 15). See In re Liuksila, 74 F.Supp.3d 4 (D.D.C.2014). Defendant subsequently filed a Motion to Stay Enforcement of Any Extradition…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- United States v. SuniaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Judicial Watch v. Department of ArmyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- United States v. MacIo SingletonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Williams v. SavageDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Liuksila v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Liuksila v. LynchDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- United States v. CaldwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- United States v. GambleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- United States v. LieuDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.