Legal Opinion
Judicial Watch v. Department of Army
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 12, 2006No. Civil Action 04-301 (RMU)PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting The Intervenor’s Motion for Reconsideration; Issuing Revised Order Authorizing the Defendant to Withhold Certain Documents
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, Judicial Watch, Inc., is a nonprofit group seeking documents from the Department of the Army, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (“FOIA”). Claiming that documents sought are properly withheld under Exemption 5 of FOIA, the defendant moved for summary judgment. The court granted in part and denied in part the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- United States v. SuniaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- People for the American Way Foundation v. National Park ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Lemmons v. Georgetown University HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Clayton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Wultz v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.