Legal Opinion

Cacurak v. St. Francis Medical Center

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 2, 2003PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBowes, J.

¶ 1 Appellants St. Francis Medical Center (“St. Francis”), Almar Radiology (“Al-mar”), and Dr. Mark Jacobson appeal from the judgment entered against them in the amount of $1,467,435.62 following a jury verdict in favor of John J. Cacurak, Appel-lee, in this medical malpractice action. Appellee has filed a cross-appeal challenging the trial court’s calculation of delay damages. After careful review, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

¶2 The relevant facts are as follows. On August 2, 1990, Appellee underwent surgery at St. Francis to have a neurofib-roma tumor removed from his spine. In…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Yacoub v. Lehigh Valley Medical Associates, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Fanning v. DavneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Primavera v. Celotex Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Majczyk v. OeschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Gunn v. GrossmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cummins v. RosaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Tecce, T. v. Hally, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Subaru of America, Inc. v. State Board of Vehicle Manufacturers, Dealers & SalespersonsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Fleishman v. General American Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Cacurak v. St. Francis Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API