Bond v. United Railroads of S.F.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco striking the defendant’s notice of intention to move for a new trial from the files. George A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. William M. Abbott, William M. Cannon, and Kingsley Cannon, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The defendant appeals from an order striking from the files its notice of intention to move for a new trial.
The action was one to recover damages for the death of the plaintiff’s son. At the trial the jury returned a general verdict in favor of plaintiff for four thousand five hundred dollars. It also returned its verdict on certain special issues. The defendant moved the court, among other things, to direct entry of judgment in favor of the plaintiff for four hundred and five dollars, and the court granted the motion. Judgment was entered accordingly on December 17, 1908. From this judgment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Klauber v. San Diego Street Car Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Union Collection Co. v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Spanagel v. DellingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Sala v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gossman v. GossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Woodcock v. Fontana Scaffolding & Equipment Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Estate of CaldwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Woodcock v. Fontana Scaffolding & Equipment Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- California MacHinery & Supply Co. v. University City Syndicate, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.