Legal Opinion

Boundary Drive Associates v. Shrewsbury Township Board of Supervisors

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 8, 1985No. 42 Middle District Appeal Docket, 1984PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HUTCHINSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a Commonwealth Court order which affirmed an order entered by the Court of Common Pleas of York County. The Court of Common Pleas had affirmed a decision of the Shrewsbury Township Zoning Hearing Board denying appellant’s request for a variance and rejecting its challenge to certain provisions of the Township’s zoning ordinance designed to preserve agricultural land. On this appeal appellant argues that the provisions in question are unconstitutional under the standards set forth in our opinion in Hopewell Township Bd. of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Concord Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Manor Healthcare Corp. v. Lower Moreland Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. C & M Developers, Inc. v. Bedminster Township Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Gardner v. New Jersey Pinelands CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  5. Kirk v. ZONING BD. OF HONEY BROOK TOWNSHIPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API