Legal Opinion

Bonee v. L & M Construction Chemicals

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided July 23, 1981No. 78-1039PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WISEMAN, District Judge.

In this diversity action, plaintiff, administrator for the estate of Roy Nolan Bonee, a Tennessee resident, seeks damage relief from, among others, BCS Chemicals, Inc., [BCS], a now defunct Illinois corporation, Dayton Sure-Grip & Shore Company [Dayton], an Ohio corporation, Danis Industries, Inc., [Danis], an Ohio corporation, and William Falls. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Danis, Dayton, and Falls have moved for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the motions of Dayton and Falls are denied, and Danis’ motion is granted.

Fact…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Lonzrick v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Elbie Mozingo, Cross-Appellee v. Correct Manufacturing Corporation and G.W. Way, Correct Manufacturing Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. Flaugher v. Cone Automatic Machine Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Nissen Corp. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Brown v. Kleen Kut Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  5. Young v. Fulton Iron Works Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API