Legal Opinion

Diversey Lever, Inc. v. Ecolab, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 20, 1999No. 98-1380, 98-1447, 98-1472, 98-1534PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, Chief Judge.

Ecolab, Inc. (“Ecolab”) appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, No. 96-CV-73112, which granted Diversey Lever, Inc. (“Diversey Lever”) summary judgment that Ecolab infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 5,009,801 (“the ’801 patent”) and 5,073,280 (“the ’280 patent”). Because the district court properly interpreted the parties’ settlement agreement, we affirm.

Background

In 1991, Diversey Lever’s predecessors, Diversey Corporation and Diversey Corp. (collectively “Diversey”), brought a patent infringement suit against Ecolab alleging…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Raymond Keith Foster, Keith Mfg. Co., and Keith Sales, Co. v. Hallco Manufacturing Co., Inc., and Olof A. HallstromCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension v. Pittston Company, United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust v. Rawl Sales & Processing Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  4. Scosche Industries, Inc. v. Visor Gear IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  5. Ernest Samuel Nossen and E. S. Nossen Laboratories, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Pandrol Usa, Lp and Pandrol Limited v. Airboss Railway Products, Inc., Airboss of America Corp., Robert M. Magnuson, and Jose R. MediavillaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  2. Ecolab Inc. v. Paraclipse, Inc. (Doing Business as Paraclipse Automated Insect Control Division), Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  3. Nasalok Coating Corp. v. Nylok Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  4. Southern Nuclear Operating Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. In Re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust Lit.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API