Legal Opinion
Scosche Industries, Inc. v. Visor Gear Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 11, 1997No. 97-1003PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
This case began when appellant Scosche Industries, Inc., filed an action in the United States District Court for the Central District of California seeking a declaratory judgment that a design patent owned by appellee Visor Gear, Inc., is invalid and that Scosche’s products do not infringe Visor Gear’s patent. Scosche also sought damages for acts of alleged unfair competition by Visor Gear. After Visor Gear filed a counterclaim alleging patent infringement, Scosche made an offer of judgment with respect to the infringement allegations in the counterclaim. Visor Gear…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Mikohn Gaming Corporation v. Acres Gaming, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Meadows v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
- Pandrol Usa, Lp and Pandrol Limited v. Airboss Railway Products, Inc., Airboss of America Corp., Robert M. Magnuson, and Jose R. MediavillaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Hunter Douglas, Inc. v. Harmonic Design, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Hallco Manufacturing Co., Inc., Plaintiff/counterclaim and Olof A. Hallstrom, Counterclaim v. Raymond Keith Foster, Defendant/counter -AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.