Legal Opinion
United States v. Thomas Steel Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 20, 1952No. Civ. No. 24760PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Circuit Judge.
(Sitting by designation.)
This action was filed by the United States on March 3, 1947, pursuant to the provisions of the Royalty Adjustment Act, 35 U.S.C.A. §§ 89 through 96, against the Thomas Steel Corporation and numerous other defendants who were operating as licensees under certain patents pertaining to the cold rolling of steel, for.the purpose of compelling such licensees to pay into the Registry of the Court royalties payable under the license agreements, and to determine the respective interests in said monies as between the United States and the owners and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- The Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Alma Motor Co. v. Timken-Detroit Axle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Commercial Union of America, Inc. v. Anglo-South American Bank, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- TCF Film Corp. v. GourleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Jennette Fruit & Produce Co. v. Seafare Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Michigan Savings & Loan League v. FrancisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1980
- United States v. Thomas Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1958
- Massey v. RieboldDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.