Legal Opinion
United States v. Thomas Steel Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided April 15, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 24760PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, District Judge.
The complaint was filed by the United States to collect monies due it under the provisions of the Royalty Adjustment Act of 1942, 56 Stat. 1013 and the Royalty Adjustment Order issued thereunder. Repealed Title 35 U.S.C. §§ 89-96.
The defendants, The Cold Metal Process Company and The Union National Bank of Youngstown, Ohio, both Ohio corporations, (hereinafter referred to as “Cold Metal” or as licensor) were the owners of certain inventions and patents relating to methods and apparatus for hot and cold rolling of metals, which they had licensed at different times to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Collier v. HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- United States v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
- Craig v. DorrCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1906
- United States v. Thomas Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1952
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hughes v. Joe G. Maloof and CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- Old Homestead Bread Co. v. Continental Baking Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1969
- Hughes v. Joe G. Maloof and CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973