Jennette Fruit & Produce Co. v. Seafare Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
The issue is whether plaintiffs voluntary dismissal of its claims against all defendants requires dismissal of a crossclaim pled by one defendant against three codefendants. We hold that it does not, and we accordingly reverse.
Plaintiff sought to recover money due it from defendant Sea-fare Corporation (defendant). It also sought to set aside a conveyance of real property from defendant to codefendants William A. Stafford and Vanessa C. Stafford on the ground that the conveyance was without consideration and made with intent to defraud plaintiff and other creditors.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, as Trustee Under Trust Agreement Dated January 3, 1967, and Known as Trust No. 24272, Plaintiff- Counterdefendant, Counterplaintiff-Appellee v. Arthur N. Bailey, Defendants-Counterplaintiffs, Counter-Cross v. Chicago Investment Corporation, Counterdefendant, Counter-Cross-PlaintiffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Frommeyer v. L. & R. CONSTRUCTION CO.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1956
- Bell v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hayes v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Hall v. George A. Fuller Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Sto Corp. v. Lancaster Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Shavitz v. City of High PointCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- McCormick v. Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.