Legal Opinion

Blaine County Investment Co. v. Gallet

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1922PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Original petition for Writ of Mandate. Tbe constitution does not require that tbe appropriation shall be for a fixed sum, and whatever tbe state constitution does not prohibit, tbe legislature may do. (People v. Miner, 46 111. 384, 386.) • In tbe absence of such a constitutional limitation, tbe legislature may appropriate money for given objects without specifying tbe amount or fixing a maximum limit.

Read the full summary

Original petition for Writ of Mandate. Tbe constitution does not require that tbe appropriation shall be for a fixed sum, and whatever tbe state constitution does not prohibit, tbe legislature may do. (People v. Miner, 46 111. 384, 386.) • In tbe absence of such a constitutional limitation, tbe legislature may appropriate money for given objects without specifying tbe amount or fixing a maximum limit. (State v. Anderson, 33 S. D. 574, 146 N. W. 703; Highgate v. State, 59 Yt. 39, 7 Atl. 898; Campbell v. Board of Commissioners, etc., 115 Ind. 591, 18 N. E. 33; Henderson v. Board of…

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

In October, 1920, the plaintiff instituted an action in the district court for Butte county to determine and adjudicate the priority of rights to the use of water from the Little Lost River and its tributaries, and on November 5, 1921, the cause being at issue, upon application of plaintiff and after due notice, the district judge made and entered an order pursuant to C. S., sec. 7032, requesting the Department of Reclamation to make an examination and survey of the streams involved, and to make and file with the clerk of the court a report thereof. Pursuant to this order, the Commissioner of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People ex rel. McCauley & Tevis v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Carr v. State ex rel. CoetlosquetIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Menefee, State Treas. v. AskewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. State ex rel. Henderson v. BurdickWyoming Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Shattuck v. KincaidOregon Supreme Court · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Crane v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Tillotson v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Ryan v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Jackson v. GalletIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State Ex Rel. Williams v. AdamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API