Legal Opinion
Haines v. City of Phoenix
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 20, 1986No. 2 CA-CIV 5657PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.
Appellant contests the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in affirmance of the City of Phoenix’s (city) aüthority to rezone the parcel in controversy. Appellees cross-appeal and challenge the trial court’s finding that the city has adopted a general or specific plan of urban development. We agree with the trial court on both counts and affirm.
On January 1, 1974, Arizona’s Urban Environment Management Act (act) became effective. Laws 1973, Chapter 178; A.R.S. § 9-461 et seq. The act requires municipalities to adopt long-range, general plans for urban…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Udell v. HaasNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Town of Bedford v. Village of Mount KiscoNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Putney v. Abington TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Love v. Board of Cty. Com'rs of BinghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Washburn v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- LaBonta v. City of WatervilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
- Mehlhorn v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Ripps v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Haines v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.