Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Big Horn Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1980No. 5167PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Justice.

The issue in this appeal is whether plaintiffs-appellants, Larry and Gloria Daniels, presented a sufficient case to the trial court for it to find that defendant-appellee, Big Horn Federal Savings and Loan Association, was liable for negligent disbursement of construction-loan proceeds borrowed by the Danielses. This appeal involves no factual disputes. Appellants’ sole contention is that the facts of this case, even when conflicts are resolved in favor of Big Horn, establish liability on the part of Big Horn.

The Savings and Loan Association correctly conceded at trial that it…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Executive Estates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Cambridge Acceptance Corp. v. HocksteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  3. Gardner Plumbing, Inc. v. CottrillOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Falls Lumber Co. v. HemanOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Southern Life Insurance v. Pollard Appliance Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moewes v. Farmer's Insurance GroupWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Cooley v. Gulf Bank, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  3. Cooley v. Gulf Bank, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  4. Garbish v. Malvern Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API