Legal Opinion

Gardner Plumbing, Inc. v. Cottrill

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1975No. 74-1042PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant initially contends that R. C. 1311.04 does not impose a duty upon a mortgagee, prior to disbursing funds of a construction loan to the mortgagor, to require affidavits of subcontractors and materialmen indicating the amount of unpaid claims owing to them.

R. C. 1311.04, in pertinent part, provides:'

“Whenever any payment of money becomes due from the owner, part owner, or lessee, or whenever the original contractor desires to draw any money from the owner, part owner, or lessee, under their contract, or whenever any mortgagee makes a written demand, such contractor shall make out and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Judson v. Bee Hive Auto Service Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Greep v. BrunsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  3. Troietto v. G. H. Hammond Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Umbaugh Pole Building Co. v. ScottOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Taylor v. Checkrite, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
  3. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Executive Estates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Thompson Electric, Inc. v. Bank OneOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Leak v. Lexington Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API