Legal Opinion

State v. Todd

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 10, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

All that appears in this case is the record proper, the Judge’s charge and the defendant’s assignments of error, all of which are addressed to portions of the charge. The case on appeal contains none of the evidence offered in the trial below.

In the case of S. v. Ray, 232 N.C. 496, 61 S.E. 2d 254, Stacy, C. J., speaking for the Court, said: “Even if some of the instructions, standing alone, should be regarded as erroneous, they could not be declared prejudicial or hurtful, unless inherently and patently so, in the absence of the evidence upon which they were based or to which they speak. 24…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. Den Ex Dem. Pickett v. PickettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1831
  3. State v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bodenheimer v. BodenheimerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Bodenheimer v. BodenheimerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API