Legal Opinion

State v. Ray

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

All that appears in this case is the record proper, the Judge’s charge and the defendant’s assignments of error. The transcript is devoid of any evidence offered at the trial or taken on the hearing. The exceptions are addressed exclusively to portions of the charge.

Even if some of the instructions, standing alone, should be regarded as erroneous, they could not be declared prejudicial or hurtful, unless inherently and patently so, in the absence of the evidence upon which they were based or to which they speak. 24 C.J.S. 733; Pickett v. Pickett, 14 N.C. 6; S. v. Wilson, 121 N.C. 650, 28 S.E.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. Den Ex Dem. Pickett v. PickettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1831

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bodenheimer v. BodenheimerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  2. State v. ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Bodenheimer v. BodenheimerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API