Legal Opinion

Rotterdamsche Lloyd v. Gosho Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 12, 1924No. 4169PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

On August 26, 1918, the libelee entered into three contracts of affreightment with the appellants for the transportation of 12,000 bales of cotton from San Erancisco to Japan—4,000 bales on the steamer Willis, leaving San Francisco October 25, 1918; 4,000 bales on the steamer Kawi, leaving San Erancisco on November 1,1918; and 4,000 bales on the steamer Tjisalak, leaving San Francisco on December 10, 1918. No part of the cotton was transported, except 650 bales carried by the steamer Kawi, leaving San Erancisco December 4, 1918. The present libel was filed in personam,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Houston & T. C. R'y Co. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. The Oregon v. Pittsburgh & L. A. Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  3. Steamship Wellesley Co. v. C. A. Hooper & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
  4. Texas Central Railroad v. Hannay-Frerichs & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Selig v. BrindleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stoddard v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1981
  2. Republic of China v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1957
  3. De La Rama S. S. Co. v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  4. H. Liebes & Co. v. KlengenbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API