Legal Opinion

Selig v. Brindle

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 28, 1923No. 3935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The Eagle, northbound rammed the Wildwood, southbound, striking her about eight feet from the stern causing damage to her hull for which a libel was brought, alleging that the Eagle was alone liable-for the collision. The answer placed the blame upon the Wildwood alleging that she failed to exhibit lights or to sound a whistle, and that she attempted to make a port to port passing. The court below held that the proximate cause of the collision was the Eagle’s negligence in traveling after nightfall without lights and in not turning to starboard on discovering the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. The OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. The City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. The Blue JacketSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. The CarrollSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Alaska Coast Co. v. Alaska Pacific FisheriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Puratich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  2. Edwards v. Wilmington Transp. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1937
  3. Rotterdamsche Lloyd v. Gosho Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  4. United States v. The AdrastusDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  5. Dench & Hardy Co. v. The Esso AnnapolisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API