Legal Opinion

H. Liebes & Co. v. Klengenberg

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 9, 1928No. 5200PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal and cross-appeal from a final decree in admiralty. In view of the two appeals, we will refer to the parties as they were designated in the court below.

The libel contains two causes of action: The first for failure on the part of the respondent to deliver certain merchandise and supplies at a point on the Wollaston Peninsula in the Arctic Ocean, about 1,260 miles from the North Pole; and the second for failure on the part of the respondent to transport certain furs from the point on the Wollaston Peninsula to San Francisco. The facts and surrounding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Northern Commercial Co. v. LindblomCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
  2. Rotterdamsche Lloyd v. Gosho Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  3. Vick v. Henry Ford & SonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stoddard v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1981
  2. Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority v. Luallipam, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1986
  3. American Bitumuls Co. v. Tribunal de Contribuciones de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1946
  4. Hoffman v. Sonoma Specialty Hospital, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API