Plane v. United States
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ and plaintiffs’ cross motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Plaintiffs, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, (“AFGE”) and its affiliates, on behalf of all AFGE bargaining unit civilian employees of defendant, Defense Logistics Agency (“DLA”), request this Court to declare that the mandatory random urinalysis drug testing provided for in the DLA Drug-Free Workplace Plan (the “Plan”) as applied to employees occupying positions as Environmental…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Middlebrooks v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Krieg v. SeyboldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Krieg v. SeyboldDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2006
- Krieg, Robert A. v. Seybold, WayneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Barrett v. ClaycombDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.