Legal Opinion
Mitchell, Gartner & Thompson v. Young
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 15, 1939No. 14000PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
A partnership firm, composed of J. W. Mitchell and others, known as Mitchell, ■Gartner & Walton, secured a judgment, in one of the district courts of Tarrant County, against a partnership firm known as D. H. Purvis & Son, and the former partnership firm was thereafter changed to that of Mitchell, Gartner & Thompson; said last named partnership firm having succeeded to all of the rights of the old firm.
The firm of D. H. Purvis & Son brought suit in one of the district courts of Tar-rant County, in the year 1935, against A. Anderson and A. Anderson, Jr., and Employers’ Liability…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cecil v. CecilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
- Fowler v. Texas Exploration Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Wortham v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- B. C. Evans Co. v. Reeves & McGlassonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
- Alexander Co. v. First Nat. Bank of LagrangeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Graco Robotics, Inc. v. Oaklawn Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996
- River Consulting, Inc. v. Sullivan, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
- Chapman v. Tyler Bank & Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Magill v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
- United States v. LesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.